We
all know, and we all indeed do agree about it, that children need
love. Any agreement is finished when it comes to applying "love"
to concrete circumstances, situations, or actions. Not that long ago,
people believed in the saying: spare the rod, spoil the child. Which
meant: Loving a child should be practised by beating her or him for
the "right" reason. Nowadays, almost everybody who hears
this will take it as a blatant attempt to rationalize cruelty. That's
how things can change!
There
were always people who would never have beaten a child, under no
circumstances. People who did (or do) so, certainly did not act out
of love. But there are a lot of subtle ways of cruelty; and to
confuse them with love tells, among other things, that an adult
person is not dealing with what there is. Nowadays we can observe
more and more people who demand kinds of thinking, foreseeing,
responsibility from children where older generations naturally knew
these children to be much too young for such expectations. But
"knowing" of course, does not mean what many people may
think - it's not just using categories for acting by applying them
"correctly" to whatever situation there is. Treating our
relatives, friends, or any other human beings is always a matter of
relation. To apply a category to any situation means to also decide
about "what there is"; but relation is a two way road. With
regard to children, who are just in the process of developing
capacities, we have to realize what a child already can do
instead of having an opinion about what she should be able to do.
That goes especially for mental and emotional faculties. Loving here
means, trusting: children usually know what's right for them, and
they will tell, if not forbidden by adults' ignorant, unattentive
behavior.
In
present-day societies there is a habit of thinking that leads to just
the opposite of love: It is the idea that everybody had to adapt to
and identify with societal conditions; she who did so would live in
reality, he who did not, wouldn't. Too many parents act upon these
prejudices without even being aware of it. It is not love forcing our
children to do what we think to be right for them. We may know what
they will have to deal with as adults, but we surely can't prepare
them for anything by making them obey. When things are not right for
them, they are not right. Where they are expected to do these anyway
(usually in case of school), they may have to - but they shouldn't be
forced into putting a false label onto this action. They will much
better be able to do what they have to when they are allowed to
express their anger about it and not having to consent. We are not
the agents of a system the cruelty of which we may long have
forgotten. Sometimes children just can't act according to adults'
expectations because these are utterly wrong. As parents, we do have
to stand for and behind our children. This is love.
Concerning
our relations to other people (and anybody else - animals, plants,
Nature in general), love is action, not feeling. That means: the love
I feel is my private feeling. The person I love is not responsible
for this; not for my love, not for any other of my feelings her
actions may indeed cause me to feel. Therefore, it is e.g. not right
to demand of the one we love not to act in a way that worries us. We
all tend to do so when we see someone putting himself in danger
(especially a child). But there are two reasons we could be wrong
about this: First, our judgment about danger being involved could be
a misjudgment; and, second, the hidden assumption, namely that the
person in question is not capable of handling any danger, could be
utterly wrong. So by asking the loved one not to do what she's up to
because of our worrying, we unconsciously tell her that we neither
trust her own judgment nor her capability of dealing with whatever
situation she might bring herself into.
There
is a third point. No one can learn to handle difficult situations by
avoiding them. Asking another one for this kind of avoidance so that
we feel better is basically an attempt to make him stop growing,
although we certainly do not mean that. Besides, we provoke the other
one not to ask for our help in case they really need it. They may
look after our feelings, but certainly avoid telling what makes us
feel worried.
That
way, our feeling of love turns into an action that has nothing to do
with love. Loving means accepting. It means, not only but especially
when it comes to children, letting the other one grow without
interfering with the process. What is really important is our
attention to recognize when help is being needed or asked for. Our
possible fears are ours to deal with. The only way of loving another
one is learning to respect their autonomy.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen